"But then one gray morning did Internet Explorer 6 no longer load The Google. Refresh was clicked, again and again, but still did Internet Explorer 6 not load The Google. Perhaps The Google was broken, the people thought, but then The Yahoo too did not load. Nor did Hotmail. Nor USAToday.com. The land was thrown into panic. Internet Explorer 6 was minimized then maximized. The Compaq Presario was unplugged then plugged back in. The old mouse was brought out and plugged in beside the new mouse. Still, The Google did not load."
~ An epic tale of tech support and bravery that is a must read for any brave souls that have ever ventured into the dusty depths to ”fix” a router (via McSweeney, via Kottke)
Holy cow this is the new Tech Dinghy?!! I have to go back to school. While I am heavily endeared to the lumbering fiberglass beast from my college racing days, this thing looks almost (dare I say it)…sexy! Nice work to Fran and the crew - what a great way to celebrate 85 years. (http://sailing.mit.edu)
"9/11 could join the Trojan Horse and Pearl Harbor among stratagems so uniquely surprising that their very success precludes their repetition"
~ (via Seitz via Schneier) Interesting sentiment. Lots to think of there when it comes to assessing one’s disposition to risk, our current security posture, and the importance of being first in order to succeed. (I shouldn’t have to say it but just in case, I’m measuring “success” as outcome / intended outcome, >=1 being exceptional, and I’m not saying that these attacks were good for the world.)
Much has been said, written and posted about SOPA over the last month or so. But what I found refreshing and enlightening about this talk from Cory Doctorow was the lengths to which he went to frame SOPA in it’s real historical context. The title of this talk says it all “The Coming War on General Purpose Computation”.
A few excerpts:
The proponents of SOPA, the Motion Picture Association of America, circulated a memo, citing research that SOPA would probably work, because it uses the same measures as are used in Syria, China, and Uzbekistan, and they argued that these measures are effective in those countries, and so they would work in America, too!
It may seem like SOPA is the end game in a long fight over copyright, and the Internet, and it may seem like if we defeat SOPA, we’ll be well on our way to securing the freedom of PCs and networks. But as I said at the beginning of this talk, this isn’t about copyright, because the copyright wars are just the 0.9 beta version of the long coming war on computation. The entertainment industry were just the first belligerents in this coming century-long conflict. We tend to think of them as particularly successful — after all, here is SOPA, trembling on the verge of passage, and breaking the internet on this fundamental level in the name of preserving Top 40 music, reality TV shows, and Ashton Kutcher movies!
It doesn’t take a science fiction writer to understand why regulators might be nervous about the user-modifiable firmware on self-driving cars, or limiting interoperability for aviation controllers, or the kind of thing you could do with bio-scale assemblers and sequencers. Imagine what will happen the day that Monsanto determines that it’s really… really… important to make sure that computers can’t execute programs that cause specialized peripherals to output organisms that eat their lunch… literally. Regardless of whether you think these are real problems or merely hysterical fears, they are nevertheless the province of lobbies and interest groups that are far more influential than Hollywood and big content are on their best days, and every one of them will arrive at the same place — “can’t you just make us a general purpose computer that runs all the programs, except the ones that scare and anger us? Can’t you just make us an Internet that transmits any message over any protocol between any two points, unless it upsets us?”
So we’re here, at logger heads, ostensibly arguing about piracy when the underlying fear of these disruptive, connective, enabling devices extends far beyond the gilded stars of Hollywood boulevard.
And it’s just the beginning.
Which is why Cory’s talk at 28C3 is required weekend viewing on BRYCE DOT VC.
It is important to recognize that SOPA opposition is not an anti-IP argument, but a protest against the consequences of limiting technology just because it may happen to have a secondary impact and make a specific activity easier. We must adapt to change instead of fighting it - that will be the only way to lead in the future.
Farewell, earthlings. North Korean state media has announced the death of leader Kim Jong Il. The Economist has featured him several times on our covers since 2000.
"Explore—go off into the craziest recesses of interaction models you’d like to see[…]
Even if you end up back where you started, you’ll have lit up the entirety of the “Zelda map” of possibilities, as it were. You’ll understand the context of your choice in the greater whole, and your work will be decidedly more confident for doing so."
~ Craig Mod, Designer, Flipboard (via A List Apart)
I’ve been digging in to some things to take my #JS chops to the next level, and have recently run into a number of frameworks that seem very powerful - Knockout, JavascriptMVC, and Backbone. I’ll need to invest time in them, but I’m curious about the differences between the MVC / MVVM models and which you think are better. Any thoughts?
All I know is that EVERY codebase should have a tutorial set as easy as Knockout - seen here in awesome browser glory.
I ██████ ████ ███████ to my ████ and all I got was ████ █████ ████████ ████ the ████.
I’ve censored the following, in opposition of a bill that gives any corporation and the US government the power to censor the internet—a bill that could pass out of committee this week. To see the uncensored text, and to stop internet censorship, visit: